Assertion (A): | Pyramid of energy can be inverted in aquatic ecosystems. |
Reason (R): | Aquatic life defies second law of thermodynamics. |
1. | Both (A) and (R) are True and the (R) correctly explains (A). |
2. | Both (A) and (R) are True but the (R) does not correctly explain (A). |
3. | (A) is True but (R) is False. |
4. | Both (A) and (R) are False. |
I: | Some aquatic ecosystems have inverted biomass pyramids. |
II: | Such aquatic ecosystems also have inverted energy pyramids. |
I: | In most ecosystems, all the pyramids, of number, of energy and biomass are upright. |
II: | Energy at a lower trophic level is always more than at a higher level. |
Assertion (A): | Pyramid of energy can never be inverted in any ecosystem. |
Reason (R): | Pyramids of biomass can be inverted in aquatic ecosystems. |
1. | Both (A) and (R) are True and (R) correctly explains (A) |
2. | Both (A) and (R) are True but (R) does not correctly explain (A) |
3. | (A) is True, (R) is False |
4. | (A) is False, (R) is True |
What trophic level is typically accorded to saprophytes in an ecological pyramid?
1. | Primary Consumer |
2. | Secondary Consumer |
3. | Top Predators |
4. | Saprophytes are not given any trophic level in ecological pyramids. |
1. | They always show producers at the bottom and top consumers at the top. |
2. | They show inverted numbers when depicting energy flow. |
3. | They can only depict energy, not matter. |
4. | They do not account for decomposers. |